Discussion about this post

User's avatar
G. C.'s avatar

While increasing transparency in editorial processes is likely to have some benefit, there's a point at which it may turn out to be counterproductive. I tend not to review for journals that disclose reviewer identity. It's hard to be constructively critical knowing that you have to deal with the author at some future gathering. Plus, the 'bad guys' will always be one step ahead. In other respects, I'm all for outing editorial malpractice.

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts